The court disposed of an appeal regarding payment confirmation. Respondent no.1 confirmed making payment in terms of an earlier order; petitioner confirmed receipt and abandoned the petition. All pending applications were disposed.
Petition discontinued; appeal and all pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUNITA DEVI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. V.N. Jha, Adv.
versus
JASMEET KOCHHAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kamal Mehta, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms.Ratna Dwivedi Dhingra, Ms.Bhavna Dhami, Advs. for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
%
O R D E R 12.05.2016
Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 submits that respondent no.1 has made the payment in terms of the order dated 4th April, 2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner confirms the receipt of the amount and therefore does not press this petition which is hereby disposed of. All pending applications are also disposed of.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
MAY 12, 2016 dk
SUNITA DEVI
JASMEET KOCHHAR
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
