This short order allows a petition subject to exceptions on the petitioner's application to withdraw with liberty to file another application in a connected proceeding. No substantive legal proposition is examined.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an application in CONT.CAS(C) 617/2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
H C SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Maroof Ahmed, Adv.
versus
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Grover, Standing Counsel with Ms. Noopur Singhal and Ms. Kanika Singh, Advs.
CHANCAHL YADAV
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 16.05.2016
CM No.18511/2016
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
CONT.CAS(C) 570/2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an appropriate application in CONT.CAS(C) 617/2014. The petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
Copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsels for the parties under signature of Court Master.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
MAY 16, 2016 ak
H C SHARMA
CHANCAHL YADAV
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
