Dr v. K Bahuguna v Ashok Lavasa
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-paragraph order disposing of a writ petition by allowing it subject to conditions for communication of a specific decision within two weeks.
What did the court decide?
Decision regarding Annexure P8 to be communicated within two weeks. Petitioner granted liberty to revive the petition if not communicated.
What the court decided
$~34
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CONT.CAS(C) 566/2016 & CM No.18304/2016
DR V K BAHUGUNA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Udayan Khandelwal, Adv.
versus
ASHOK LAVASA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 13.05.2016
CM No.18304/2016
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
CONT.CAS(C) 566/2016
- Vide order dated 16th February, 2016, the Writ Court directed the respondent to disposed off the petitioner’s representations Annexure P1, P5, P6, P8 and P10 within a period of eight weeks.
- Learned Standing Counsel for Central Government submits that vide letter dated 06th May, 2016, the respondent has communicated the decision in report of Annexure P1, P5, P6 and P10 to the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dr V K Bahuguna
- respondent
Ashok Lavasa
Coram
J.R. Midha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court