Disposed
Narinder Kaur v. Puneet Kumar Goel & Ors.
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/55/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the continuous application.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~16
¶2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CONT.CAS(C) 55/2016
¶4
NARINDER KAUR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Jaspreet S.Rai, Advocate
¶5
versus
¶6
PUNEET KUMAR GOEL & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Aditya Singh, Advocate for R-1-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
¶7
%
¶8
O R D E R 10.05.2016
¶9
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the order dated 8.7.2015 and, therefore, the petitioner does not wish to pursue this petition any more.
¶10
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
¶11
J.R. MIDHA, J.
¶12
MAY 10, 2016 sv
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
NARINDER KAUR
- respondent
PUNEET KUMAR GOEL
Coram
AI extract
J.R. MIDHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court