Petitioner filed a continuous sub judice case. Petitioner moved to withdraw the petition based on an amicable resolution between parties. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition or outcome of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJ SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate
versus
NARESH KUMAR AHUJA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. D.K. Malhotra and Mr. Rajesh Malhotra, Advocates for respondent Nos.1 to 3 Mr. R.P. Luthra and Mr. Saurabh Luthra, Advocates for respondent No.4
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 10.05.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits on instructions that the parties have amicably resolved the matter and, therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition.
This petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
MAY 10, 2016 rsk
RAJ SHARMA
NARESH KUMAR AHUJA & ORS.
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
