Petitioner withdrew the petition as action against unauthorized construction was taken. Disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 19.01.2016
Action taken report has been filed. Learned counsel for the
respondent no.1 submits that action has already been taken and property has been booked, inasmuch as, unauthorized construction has been demolished. Photographs have been placed on record. In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petition be disposed of as not pressed.
Disposed of as not pressed. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
JANUARY 19, 2016/ dk
SACHIN KUMAR GUPTA
THE COMMISSSIONER, SOUTH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
