This order dismisses a writ petition challenging refusal to supply certain annexures to a show cause notice, holding it is not a sufficient ground to interdict the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
BIRBAL ACADEMY & PUBLICATIONS PVT LTD...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sushil K. Tekriwal and Dr. Mamta Tekriwal, Advocates.
versus
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Agrim Bhasin for Mr. Satish Kumar, Senior Standing counsel.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R % 19.01.2016
annexures to the show cause notice which are either not supplied to it or copies thereof are not legible. It is stated that the Petitioner has made a request in this regard to the authority concerned.
accordance with law.
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) No. 10707/2015
process at this stage.
S. MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JANUARY 19, 2016 dn
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) No. 10707/2015
BIRBAL ACADEMY & PUBLICATIONS PVT LTD
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, DELHI
S. MURALIDHAR
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
