Dismissed¶25

Jeevan Das Jogi v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC18 Feb 2026WPC/738/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition WPC No. 738 of 2025 (Chhattisgarh HC, Bilaspur); dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue pending proceedings before SDO (Revenue), Simga, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara; petitioners Jeevan Das Jogi and Devcharan Sahu; respondents include State of Chhattisgarh Revenue/Energy Departments and Orissa Generation Phase-II Transmission Ltd. (OGPTL); counsel: Akash Pandey, Shobhit Mishra (Dy. Govt. Advocate), Priyanka Rai; decided 19/02/2026 by Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J.; no costs; no merits adjudicated; NAFR.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the writ petition permitted, with liberty to pursue the petitioners' case before the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Simga, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara; no costs awarded. ¶25

Jeevan Das Jogi Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:9352

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 738 of 2025

¶6

1 - Jeevan Das Jogi S/o Sadan Lal Jogi Aged About 74 Years R/o Village- Jaroud, Tahsil Simga, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)

¶7

2 - Devcharan Sahu S/o Ram Bharos Sahu Aged About 75 Years R/o VillageJaroud, Tahsil Simga, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)

¶8

... Petitioners

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

2 - The Secretary State Of Chhattisgarh, Energy Department, Mantralaya, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)

¶12

3 - The Secretary State Of Chhattisgarh, Energy Department, Mantralaya, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)

¶13

4 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Simga District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)

¶14

5 - Orissa Generation Phase-Ii Transmission Ltd., (Ogptl), Through- Executive Engineer House No.1/03, Phase Ii, Surya Vihar, Junwani Road, Bhilai (C.G.)

¶15

... Respondent(s)

¶16

{Cause title, as taken from CIS}

¶17

¶18

For Petitioners : Mr. Akash Pandey, Advocate. For Respondents No. 1 to 4 : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No. 5 : Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate.

¶19

{Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi}

¶20

Order on Board

¶21

19/02/2026

¶22

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that proceeding is already pending before Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Simga, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara for redressal of grievance of the petitioners, therefore, they do not want to pursue instant petition, hence, he prays that they may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue their case before Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Simga, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara.

¶23