Dismissed¶27

Bank of India v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC18 Feb 2026WPC/5041/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bank of India v. State of Chhattisgarh & others, WPC No. 5041 of 2025, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, order dated 19/02/2026 by Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi. Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to refile; no substantive adjudication, no impugned order, no statutory provisions or case citations. Advocates: Saket Pandey for petitioner; Arham Siddiqui (Panel Lawyer) for State.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to the petitioner to file a fresh petition in accordance with law. ¶27

Bank of India Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

2026:CGHC:8816

¶3

Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2026.02.19 17:16:04 +0530

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

NAFR

¶6

WPC No. 5041 of 2025

¶7

Bank Of India Through Authorised Officer, Shri Suraj Kumar, S/o Shri Kamlesh Prasad, Aged About 40 Years, Office At- Arb, Bank Of India, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, C.G.

¶8

... Petitioner.

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Atal Nagar, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur C.G.

¶11

The Collector-Cum - District Magistrate, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur C.G.

¶12

The Tehsildar, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur C.G.

¶13

The Superintendent Of Police, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur C.G.

¶14

The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur C.G.

¶15

M/s Mahamaya Vaccine, Through Proprietor, Fanindra Mishra, S/o Late Mool Chand Mishra, R/o Near Shiv Mandir, Vidya Upnagar, Diprapara, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur C.G.

¶16

Jyoti Mishra W/o Fanindra Mishra R/o Near Shiv Mandir, Vidya Upnagar, Diprapara, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur C.G.

¶17

Syama Devi Mishra W/o Late Mool Chand Mishra R/o Near Shiv Mandir, Vidya Upnagar, Diprapara, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur C.G.

¶18

... Respondents.

¶19

(cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery)

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate. For State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, Panel Lawyer.

¶21

¶22

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

¶23

Order on Board

¶24

19/02/2026

¶25

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh petition in accordance with law.

¶26

Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer.

¶27

Having regard to submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving the liberty as prayed for.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge

¶30

Ajay

Bank of India v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of India v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Govinda Kosale Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rajdev Minj Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/S. Sunita Finlease Limited Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Roshan Lal Hablani Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jeevan Das Jogi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mahesh Soni Vs State of Chhattisgarh