Rajdev Minj Vs State of Chhattisgarh

1

2026:CGHC:8632

NAFR

Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2026.02.18 16:54:37 +0530

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPC No. 635 of 2026

¶7

Rajdev Minj S/o Late Ramlagan Aged About 38 Years R/o VillageChitvishrampur, Village- Panchayat- Chitvishrampur, P.S. And TahsilBalrampur, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G.

¶8

... Petitioner.

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Food Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G.

¶11

The Collector- Balrampur, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G.

¶12

Sub- Divisional Officer (Revenue), Balrampur, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G.

¶13

The Tahsildar/ Nodal Officer Paddy Purchasing Center- Balrampur, Distt.Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G.

¶14

Manager Adim Jati Seva Sahkari Maryadit- Bardar Tahsil Balrampur, Distt.Balrampur-Ramanujganj C.G.

¶15

... Respondents.

¶16

(cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner : Mr. A. N. Pandey, Advocate. For Res/State : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. GA.

¶17

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

¶18

Order on Board

¶19

18/02/2026

¶20

This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking following reliefs:-

¶21

2

¶22

"10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to issue the token to the petitioner for selling of 525 bags paddy and purchase the paddy of the petitioner.

¶23

10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider and decide the represented filed by the petitioner dated 28.01.2026 Annexure-P/3 as early as possible.

¶24

10.3 Any other relief or reliefs may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. "

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is owner of agriculture land situated at Villages Chitvishrampur and Banour. The petitioner has harvested paddy on a total area of 6.3600 hectares within a joint holding and his name has also been registered in 'Ekikrat Kisan Portal' vide Annexure-P/1 bearing Registration No.TF3900580102471. After said registration, the petitioner was permitted and granted token (Annexure-P/2) to sale 120 Quintal paddy for the Khareef Season 2025-26. However, no token has been issued by the respondents/Authorities to sale remaining 525 paddy begs harvested from his agricultural land registered under the Ekikrat Kisan Portal. He further submits that the petitioner has made various representations to the respondents/Authorities, despite that no taken has been issued in his favour. Therefore, a direction may be issued to respondents No.2 to 4 to issue token to the petitioner for sale of 525 paddy to Adim Jati Seva Sahkari Maryadait-Bardar Society (respondent No.5).

¶26

Per contra, learned State counsel submits that though the petitioner has been permitted to sale 120 Quintals paddy against token (Annexure-P/2), but he

¶27

3

¶28

has not generated the token after the date 03.12.2025, when first token was issued to him, which shows negligence on the part of the petitioner, therefore, he cannot be given benefit for his carelessness.

¶29

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶30

From perusal of record, it is apparent that Annexure-P/1 is registration issued in favour of the petitioner, whereby he has been registered in 'Ekikrat Kisan Portal' bearing Registration No.TF3900580102471 (Kharif Season 2025-26) and 6.3600 hectares of agricultural land was registered to sale paddy in respect of the petitioner. Subsequently, he was issued token (Annexure-P/2) on 03.12.2025 for sale of 120 Quintal paddy and same has already been sold according to the petitioner. Therefore, considering that 6.3600 hectares of agricultural land of the petitioner has already been registered for sale of paddy, respondents No.2 to 4 (Respondents/Authority) are directed to issue token to the petitioner for sale of remaining paddy harvested from registered agricultural land in the name of petitioner for total area of 6.3600 hectares, within 15 days from today. It is also observed that such token shall be issued subject to the physical verification of the paddy harvested from the aforesaid land.

¶31

With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands disposed of.

¶32

Sd/(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge

¶33

Ajay

Rajdev Minj v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajdev Minj v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Kumar Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dogendra Gond Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Aatmaram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bank of Baroda Vs the Collector and District Magistrate

M/S J.S. Steel Pvt. Ltd. Vs Steel Authority of India Limited

Smt. Motim Sahu Vs Bank of Baroda