Disposed¶27

N. Radhika v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC10 Mar 2026WPC/1044/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court (Bilaspur), WPC No. 1044 of 2026, decided 11/03/2026, NAFR, Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi. Article 226 writ petition by land purchaser N. Radhika seeking timely conclusion of pending Batankan Revenue Case No. 202505100700050 (registered 09.05.2025 by Tahsildar, Durg) concerning Khasra No. 155/4 (0.084 ha) bought from Smt. Kunti Bai on 14.02.2020, stalled by objections of respondent No. 5 Omprakash Sen. Court disposed of petition directing respondent No. 4 to decide the case within 45 days after hearing all parties; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with directions to respondent No. 4 (Tahsildar, Durg) to decide revenue case No. 202505100700050 as early as possible, preferably within 45 days from receipt/submission of copy of the order; no costs awarded. ¶27

N. Radhika Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

2026:CGHC:11673

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 1044 of 2026

¶6

N. Radhika D/o P. V. N. Rao, Aged About 45 Years R/o 68/c Priyadarshini Nagar, Risali Bhilai, Tahsil And District- Durg (C.G.)

¶7

versus

¶8

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)

¶9

2 - Collector, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)

¶10

3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)

¶11

4 - Tahsildar, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)

¶12

5 - Omprakash Sen, R/o Pachripara, Durg, Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.)

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

{Cause title, as taken from CIS}

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr. Punit Ruparel, Advocate. For Resp. No. 1 to 4 : Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. Advocate General.

¶16

{Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi}

¶17

Order on Board

¶18

11/03/2026

¶19

1. Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner seeking following reliefs :-

¶20

“10.1 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No. 4 to conclude the pending proceeding in Revenue

¶21

¶22

Case No. 202505100700050 within stipulated time on its own merits, after hearing all the necessary parties.

¶23

10.2 Any other relief, which may deem fit, in the interest of justice.

¶24

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner purchased the land bearing Khasra No. 155/4, area 0.084 hectare from Smt. Kunti Bai vide registered sale-deed dated 14.02.2020, thereafter, he filed an application for Batankan of aforesaid land, to which revenue case No. 202505100700050 was registered by respondent No. 4 on 09.05.2025, but because of some baseless objection raised by one Omprakash Sen (respondent No. 5), aforesaid revenue case has not been reached to its logical conclusion. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of directing respondent No. 4 to pass final order in aforesaid revenue case.

¶25

3. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to allow the limited prayer made by petitioner's counsel.

¶26

4. On due consideration and the contention putforth by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 4 to decide revenue case No. 202505100700050 as early as possible, preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt /submission of copy of this order.

¶27

5. With the aforesaid observations & directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost (s).

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

AMIT Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR KUMAR DUBEYDate: 2026.03.12 DUBEY 16:28:22 +0530

¶30

(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge

N. Radhika v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N. Radhika v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxmin Mahant Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Hanuman Prasad Sharma Vs Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited

Manish Kumar Pandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vineet Choudhary Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Gautam Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sumit Tours and Travels Vs State of Chhattisgarh