Vineet Choudhary Vs State of Chhattisgarh

10.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to not interfered with peaceful possession over the dispute land in question and for not issuing any order curtailing the petitioner right to property under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India including right to further alienate the disputed land.

¶27

10.3 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records of the instant case and of land for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court.

¶28

10.4 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice.

¶29

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is registered owner of land bearing Khasra No. 627/1, area 0.09 hectare and Khasra No. 627/2, area 0.28 hectare situated at village Kurud, Patwai Halka No. 46, R.N. Kohka, Tehsil-Durg, District Durg (C.G.). He wants to sell aforesaid land, but Registrar refused to get execute the sale deed in respect of petitioner's land on the ground that Collecor, Durg has passed impugned order (Annexure P- 1) dated 29.03.2023 whereby selling and purchasing of the lands situated at village Kurud has been prohibited on account of illegal plotting. He further submits that because of some financial need, the petitioner wants to sell

¶30

3

¶31

aforesaid land, hence, the Collector, Durg may be directed to permit the petitioner to sell the same.

¶32

3. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, would submit that if the petitioner wishes to sell the aforesaid land within permissible limit, then the State / Revenue Authorities have no objection to allow the contention of the petitioner and he may permitted to sell his land owned by him within permissible limit of land transaction without any illegal plotting.

¶33

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents annexed with the petition.

¶34

5. Perusal of the pleading and documents, it is evident that the order of restriction of sale and purchase has been imposed by the authorities in order to prevent the illegal plotting. Since the petitioner wishes to sell his total land owned by him within permissible limit of land transaction, hence, there is nothing left to adjudicate the issue at this stage, hence, it is directed that the petitioner be permitted to sell his aforesaid land within permissible limit of land transaction.

¶35

6. With the aforesaid observations & directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No cost(s).

¶36

7. Pending interlocutory application (s), if any, stands disposed of.

¶37

Sd/-

¶38

(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge

¶39

Amit AMITKUMAR Digitally signedby AMIT KUMARDUBEYDate: 2026.03.12 DUBEY 16:31:04 +0530

Vineet Choudhary v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vineet Choudhary v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxmin Mahant Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Hanuman Prasad Sharma Vs Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited

Manish Kumar Pandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

N. Radhika Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Gautam Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sumit Tours and Travels Vs State of Chhattisgarh