The High Court disposed of the writ petition regarding a penalty imposed on an employee, directing the competent authority to decide the petitioner's pending appeal within one month without expressing an opinion on the merits.
Direction issued to decide pending internal appeal within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.1128 of 2024
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause-title, as taken from CIS System)
For Petitioner : Mr. Ritesh Verma, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
Order on Board
22.02.2024
Heard
2
be disposed of with a direction to concerned respondent/competent authority to consider and decide the pending appeal of the petitioner (Annexure P/1) within a stipulated period as fixed by this Court in accordance with the relevant rules and law.
Sd/-
(Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge
Abhigya.S
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending appeal against the penalty of cessation of advance increments should be directed to be decided within a stipulated time?
Faneshvar Yadav
General Manager (H.R.) C.S.P.D.C.L.
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
