A single-judge order dismissing a contempt of court application due to the petitioner's non-appearance, noting the case as no longer pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ct. 12.9 No.
14 2022 8 akb (F.N.H.)
C.P.A.N. 547 of 2000 In C.O. 22053 (W) of 1995 Dr. Samarjit Roy –VersusDr. S.M. Chatterjee & Anr.
( Main File Not In Court )
None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time
of call.
This is a contempt application under the Contempt of Court’s Act, 1971 as well as under Article 215 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner on 24th March, 2000.
By filing the application, the petitioner sought for punishment of the contemnors / respondents for violation of the order dated 5th August, 1999 passed by a learned Single Bench in C.O. 22053 (W) of 1995. Since the filing of the application, none appeared for the petitioner to press the application.
I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the contempt application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
Let this contempt application along with the order passed today be tagged with the main file by the concerned department.
( Rabindranath Samanta, J.)
Dr. Samarjit Roy
Dr. S.M. Chatterjee & Anr.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
