Dismissed
Padam Bahadur Sonar v. Surajit Kar Purakayastha
Calcutta HCCPAN/273/2000
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Item no.5 Subrata Bhattacharyya IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
Item no.5 Subrata Bhattacharyya IN THE HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
09-09-2022 Item no.5
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.273 of 2000 Padam Bahadur Sonar
-vs-
Sri Surajit Kar Purakayastha arising out of CO. No.6344(W) of 1986
None …for the petitioner
None represents the applicant to press the contempt application on call.
By way of this contempt application filed on February 8, 2000 under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought for punishment of the contemner/respondent concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated October 7, 1988 passed in CO No.6344(W) of 1986.
Since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
Subrata Bhattacharyya
Padam Bahadur Sonar
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court