The Single Bench dismissed the accused contempt application filed under the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 by the petitioner due to his failure to appear in court to press the application.
The contempt application is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ct. 12.9 No.
14 2022 7 akb (F.N.H.)
C.P.A.N. 157 of 2000 In
W.P. 18181 (W) of 1999 Sanjib Kumar Samai –VersusSurya Kanta Das & Ors.
( Main File Not In Court )
None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time
of call.
This is a contempt application under the Contempt of Court’s Act, 1971 filed by the petitioner on 24th January 2000.
By filing the instant application, the petitioner sought for punishment of the contemnors / respondents for violation of the order dated 11th October, 1999 passed by a learned Single Bench in W.P. 18181 (W) of 1999. Since the filing of the application, none appeared for the petitioner to press the application.
I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the contempt application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
Let this contempt application along with the order passed today be tagged with the main file by the concerned department.
( Rabindranath Samanta, J.)
Sanjib Kumar Samai
Surya Kanta Das & Ors.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
