Dismissed
Syed Latif Ali v. Mujibar Rahaman
Calcutta HCCPAN/14/2000
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
In W.P. 20048 (W) of 1997 Syed Latif Ali…
What the court decided
AI extract
In W.P. 20048 (W) of 1997 Syed Latif Ali…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ct. 12.9 No.
14 2022 6 akb (F.N.H.)
C.P.A.N. 14 of 2000 In W.P. 20048 (W) of 1997 Syed Latif Ali –VersusMujibar Rahaman
( Main File Not In Court )
None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time
of call.
This is a contempt application under the Contempt of Court’s Act, 1971 filed by the petitioner on 4th January 2000.
The petitioner by filing the instant application, sought for punishment of the contemnors / respondents for violation of the order dated 4th November 1997 passed by a learned Single Bench in W.P. 20048 (W) of 1997. Since the filing of the application, none appeared for the petitioner to press the application.
I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the contempt application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
Let this contempt application along with the order passed today be tagged with the main file by the concerned department.
( Rabindranath Samanta, J.)
Syed Latif Ali
Mujibar Rahaman
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court