Contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act and Article 215 dismissed due to non-appearance of petitioners who expressed lack of interest in proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
07-09-2022 Item no.16
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.1610 of 2001 Sadekul Amin & Ors.
-vs-
Sri Netai Chandra Debnath & Anr.
arising out of WPA No.17705 of 2000
None …for the petitioners
None represents the petitioners on call.
This is a contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 as well as under Article 215 of the Constitution of India filed on December 6, 2001 seeking punishment of the contemners/the fifth and sixth respondents in the writ petition for violation of an order dated October 17,, 2000 passed in WP No.17705(W) of 2000.
I find that since filing of the application, none moved to press this contempt application.
Considering all aspects of the matter, I feel that the petitioners are no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
Sadekul Amin & Ors.
Sri Netai Chandra Debnath & Anr.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
