This is a contempt application filed for violation of a prior court order. The High Court found that the petitioners did not move to press the application since it was filed in 2000. Consequently, the application was dismissed due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06-09-2022 Item no.18
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.1448 of 2001 Nirapada Paul & Ors.
-vs-
Shri Tapan Biswas arising out of CO No.13920(W) of 1995
None …for the petitioners
This is an application for contempt filed on October 9, 2001 under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for violation of an order dated December 4, 1996 in CO No.13920(W) of 1995 passed by a single Judge of this court seeking punishment of the alleged contemner/the second respondent in the writ petition.
I find that since filing of the contempt application in the year 2000, none moved to press it. Hence, I feel that the petitioners are not interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application should be proceeded with in light of the petitioners' non-appearance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Subrata Bhattacharyya
Shri Tapan Biswas
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
