In a contempt application under the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 filed by the petitioner, the court dismissed the petition due to the petitioner's failure to appear at the time of call and indicated lack of interest in proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ct. 06.9 No.
14 2022 9 akb (F.N.H.)
C.P.A.N. 247 of 2000 In W.P. 11071 (W) of 1999 Goutam Pramanik –VersusMalay Kumar Dey
( Main File Not In Court )
None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time
of call.
This is an application under the Contempt of Court’s Act, 1971 filed by the petitioner on 3rd February 2000.
By filing the instant application, the petitioner sought for punishment of the contemnor / respondent for allegedly violation of the order dated 16th August 1999 passed by a learned Single Bench in W.P. 11071 (W) of 1999. Since, filing of the application, none moved on behalf of the petitioner.
I feel that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with the contempt application on hand.
Therefore, the contempt application is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
Let this contempt application along with the order passed today be tagged with the main file by the concerned department.
( Rabindranath Samanta, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to proceed with the contempt application filed by the petitioner for non-appearance.
Goutam Pramanik
Malay Kumar Dey
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
