A listing/adjournment order of the Bombay High Court: matters could not be heard for want of time. Office objections to be removed within two weeks, affidavits to be filed, existing interim orders to continue, and the matters were given dates for admission, I.A. or final hearing in January-February 2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Talwalkar .. 1 .. common order 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
DATE :- 2nd DECEMBER, 2024
Per Court :-
before the next date.
| Serial Board |
Nos. of matters | on the To be listed on |
To be listed in the category |
|---|---|---|---|
| 58-61 | 14/01/2025 | Urgent Admission | |
| 63-66 | 14/01/2025 | Urgent Admission | |
| 67-71 | 17/01/2025 | I.A. Order | |
| 72-97 | 27/01/2025 | Due Admission | |
| 99-121 | 29/01/2025 | Due Admission | |
| 122-130 | 29/01/2025 | Due Admission | |
| 132-141 | 30/01/2025 | Due Admission | |
| 143-167 | 04/02/2025 | Due Admission | |
| 168-195 | 05/02/2025 | Due Admission |
Talwalkar .. 2 .. common order 2
| 197-200 | 06/02/2025 | Due Admission |
|---|---|---|
| 202-212 | 06/02/2025 | Due Admission |
| 214-216 | 06/02/2025 | Due Admission |
| 218-219 | 06/02/2025 | Due Admission |
| 222-224 | 10/02/2025 | Due Admission |
| 226-227 | 10/02/2025 | Due Admission |
| 229-234 | 10/02/2025 | Due Admission |
| 236-254 | 11/02/2025 | Due Admission |
| 257 | 11/02/2025 | Due Admission |
| 258-259 | 11/02/2025 | For Final Hearing. |
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR
Digitally signed byARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Date: 2024.12.04 15:27:31 +0530
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
ASHWIN D. BHOBE
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
