Disposed¶15

Narasgonda Balasaheb Rajmane v. Dr M K Patil

Bombay HC7 Apr 2025CP/574/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court common order dated 17.07.2025 (Ghuge & Ankhad, JJ.): batch of matters adjourned for paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders to continue; reply/rejoinder affidavits to be filed before next date; matters listed 04/08/2025 to 20/08/2025 (Fresh/For/Urgent/Due Admission). Listing/administrative order; no ruling on merits.

What did the court decide?

Administrative listing directions only: office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders, if any earlier granted, to continue; affidavits in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed before the next date; matters listed by serial-number batches between 04/08/2025 and 20/08/2025. No merits decided. ¶15

Narasgonda Balasaheb Rajmane vs Dr M K Patil — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶15

Issue for consideration

Scheduling of the matters that could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time, and the interim directions (removal of office objections, filing of affidavits, continuation of interim orders) to govern until they are heard.

¶12

Court's answer

All office objections in these matters shall be removed within two weeks.

¶13

Ratio / Principle

Subject to compliance of the above (removal of office objections), ad-interim/interim orders, if any granted earlier, would continue.

¶15

Key takeaways

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall be filed before the next date.ratio¶16
The matters are to be listed on the dates and in the categories specified in the chart, ranging from 04/08/2025 to 20/08/2025 under Fresh Admission, For Admission, Urgent Admission, Urgent Order and Due Admission headings.ratio¶17

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court (Coram: Ravindra V. Ghuge & Gautam A. Ankhad, JJ.), common order dated 17 July 2025: a batch of matters on the Board could not be taken up for hearing at the time of rising at 6.05 pm owing to paucity of time. The Court directed that all office objections be removed within two weeks; that, subject to such compliance, ad-interim/interim orders, if any earlier granted, would continue; that affidavits in reply/rejoinder, if any, be filed before the next date; and listed the matters by serial-number batches between 04/08/2025 and 20/08/2025 under Fresh Admission, For Admission, Urgent Admission, Urgent Order and Due Admission categories. Purely administrative/listing order; no issue on merits decided, no statute or precedent cited, no parties named.

¶1

Laxmi .. 1 .. common order 17.07.2025

¶2

LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE

¶3

Digitally signed by LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Date: 2025.07.22 17:06:19 +0530

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶6

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE

¶7

¶8

GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ.

¶9

DATE : 17^th JULY, 2025

¶10

P.C. :-

¶11

At the time of rising at 6.05 pm, the matters mentioned in

¶12

the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

¶13

In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.

¶14

Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim

¶15

order, if any granted earlier, would continue.

¶16

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date.

¶17

Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-

¶18

Serial Nos. of matters on the Board	To be listed on	To be listed in the Category
16 to 23	04/08/2025	Fresh Admission
27 to 33	04/08/2025	Fresh Admission
34	11/08/2025	For Admission
35 to 41	11/08/2025	Urgent Admission

¶19

Laxmi ..	2 ..	common order 17.07.2025
43 to 45	11/08/2025	Urgent Admission
47 & 48	04/08/2025	Urgent order
49	04/08/2025	Due Order
50 & 51	11/08/2025	Due Admission
53 to 76	12/08/2025	Due Admission
101 to 143	13/08/2025	Due Admission
145 to 158	14/08/2025	Due Admission
160 to 172	14/08/2025	Due Admission
78 to 100	13/08/2025	Due Admission
174 to 200	18/08/2025	Due Admission
201 to 232	19/08/2025	Due Admission
234 to 243	20/08/2025	Due Admission
245 to 261	20/08/2025	Due Admission

¶20

( GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.)

¶21

(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )

Narasgonda Balasaheb Rajmane v. Dr M K Patil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narasgonda Balasaheb Rajmane v. Dr M K Patil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sudarshan Sharad Mohite and Ors. vs the School Education Nd Sport Dept. and Ors.

Vikas Jayram Fhatak vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mayura Vishal Shelke and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Sec. Higher and Terchnical Education and Ors.

Santosh Uttam Mane vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Ors.

Shilpa Shivaji Shinde vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Avdhut Gorakhnath Kumbhar and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Ors.