Siddheshwar Shikshan Sanstha, Dongarsoni v. State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCCP/515/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Administrative common order adjourning multiple matters that could not be reached for hearing due to paucity of time, directing removal of office objections within two weeks, continuation of interim orders, filing of affidavits, and fixing future listing dates.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Talwalkar .. 1 .. common order 2
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
¶4
DATE :- 2nd DECEMBER, 2024
¶5
Per Court :-
¶6
- At the time of rising at 6.00 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶7
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶8
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
¶9
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
¶10
before the next date.
¶11
- Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-
Coram
AI extract
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mukund Rajaram Chavan and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Satish Kisan Salunke vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Ors.
Sugandha Ganesh More vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Ors.
Samir Chandrakant Bhorde vs the State of Maharashtra through the Seceretay