Sudhakar Kushaba Gode v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
Bombay HCWP/3433/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Listing order: matters could not be heard for want of time; office objections to be removed in two weeks, interim orders to continue, pleadings to be filed, and matters assigned future hearing dates by category.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
.. 1 .. common order 16.10.24
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE :- 16th OCTOBER, 2024
¶4
P.C :-
¶5
- At the time of rising at 6.30 pm, the matters mentioned in the
¶6
chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶7
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶8
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
¶9
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
¶10
before the next date.
¶11
- Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-
Coram
AI extract
Ravindra V. Ghuge
M.M. Sathaye
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Vishal S/O Manjabapu Chitale and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary, School Edu. and Sport Dept. and Ors.
Santosh Uttam Mane vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Ors.
Sunita Gorakhnath Deshumukh and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra Thr Secretary and Ors.
Vishal S/O Manjabapu Chitale and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary, School Edu. and Sport Dept. and Ors.