Procedural order only: the appellant's counsel was discharged for want of instructions; no one appeared for the appellant, against whom a non-bailable warrant had been issued, and the criminal appeal against conviction was admitted. The order decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale 29-apeal-29-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 29 OF 2024
Gensiddha @ Guddu Bhimashankar Mhetre ..Appellant VS. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr. V.V. Phatate, for the appellant. Mr. A. R. Patil, APP for the State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : JANUARY 15, 2024
P.C. :
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Signed by: Urmila P. Ingale Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 16/01/2024 11:16:02
Gensiddha @ Guddu Bhimashankar Mhetre
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
