Criminal Revision Application rejected. The High Court declined interference with the lower courts' award of maintenance and house rent, stating the decision was not without basis.
The Criminal Revision Application is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:1674
PMB 3.REVN.503-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.503 OF 2017
SATISH MOHANRAO PATIL ..APPLICANT VS.
RUPALI SATISH PATIL AND ORS. ..RESPONDENTS
Adv. D. D. Rananaware for the applicant. Ms. S. D. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : JANUARY 15, 2024
P.C. :
1/3
PMB 3.REVN.503-17.doc
in view of the relationship which the respondent-wife was having outside the marriage, she on her own accord left the matrimonial home. It is further submitted that the applicant is looking after the children and therefore the award of monthly maintenance of Rs.1,000/- for children is not justified.
2/3
PMB 3.REVN.503-17.doc
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
3/3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the maintenance and house rent awarded to the wife and children should be revisited given the wife's silence and alleged relationship outside marriage.
Whether the established facts regarding the guardian's maintenance allowance were based on reasonable grounds.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SATISH MOHANRAO PATIL
RUPALI SATISH PATIL AND ORS.
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
