Dismissed as the impugned judgment acquitting the applicant survived, rendering the criminal revision application infructuous. No substantive legal proposition determined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
024:BHC-AS:2
Diksha Rane 2. APPR 50-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.50/2019 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.161/2019
BIRENDRA S/O. RAJKUMAR DWIVEDI ..APPLICANT VS.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Sushil Upadhyay i/b. Mr. Ashok M. Saraogi for the applicant.
Smt. S. D. Shinde, APP for the State. PSI Bajrang Desai, Samta Nagar Police Station.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : JANUARY 12, 2024.
P.C. :
As the applicant has been acquitted by the trial Court, nothing survives for consideration in the revision application. Consequently, the criminal revision application and the criminal application are disposed of as infructuous.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Birendra S/o. Rajkumar Dwivedi
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
