Interim application for condonation of delay in filing a criminal appeal was allowed; delay condoned for the reasons stated in the application, over opposition by the State and respondent no.2. The order decides nothing of general application.
Delay in filing the criminal appeal condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:1836-DB
Urmila Ingale 31-ia-80-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2023 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL ST. NO. 275 OF 2023
Sachin Raghunath Toke ..Applicant VS. The State of Maharashtra and anr. ..Respondents
Mr. Abhay a. Jadhavar, for the applicant. Mr. Prashant Jadhav, for Respondent No.2. Ms. S. D. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : JANUARY 15, 2024
P.C. :
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Sachin Raghunath Toke
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
