Petitioner in PIL sought leave to withdraw the petition. The High Court granted leave and disposed of the PIL as withdrawn, consequentialy disposing of a connected civil application.
Leave granted to withdraw the PIL and dispose the same as withdrawn; consequential disposal of a connected civil application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
998-PIL-57-2020.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
998 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.57 OF 2020
KANTILAL DAGA PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Nitin S. Salunke h/f Mr. Bagul
Dnyaeshwar S Bagul
AGP for Respondents/State: Mr. S. G. Karlekar
Advocate for Respondent No.7: Mr. M. R. Deshmukh
Advocate for Respondent No.8: Mr. S. G. Chapalgaonkar
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 12th October, 2021
P. C.:
1.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that,
subsequently, the scheme has changed.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation (PIL).
3. Leave is granted.
4. PIL is disposed of as withdrawn.
5. In view of the disposal of PIL, civil application also stands
disposed of.
(R. N. LADDHA, J.)
(S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
Sameer
KANTILAL DAGA PATIL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
R. N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court