Petitioner sought writ relief regarding non-mutation of his name in the record of rights by the Chief Officer of the Municipal Council, Beed. The single-judge bench disposed of the petition without costs.
The writ petition is disposed of. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1018-WP-5746-2021.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1018 WRIT PETITION NO.5746 OF 2021
MOHAMOOD ABDUL RAFFIQ MAHAOOD IBRAHIM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AD ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S. B. Solanke h/f Mr. Gaikwad Amol R.
AGP for Respondents/State: Mr. K. N. Lokhande
Advocate for Respondent No.2: Mr. G. K. Naik - Thigle
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 12th October, 2021
P.C. :
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, the application
filed by the petitioner for mutating his name in the record of rights is
not attended to by the Chief Officer of the Municipal Council, Beed.
3.Mr. Thigle, the learned counsel appears for respondent
No.2 and submits that in case the application of the petitioner (Page-
19) is pending, then the same would be decided by the Chief Officer
on its own merits in accordance with law, preferably within a period
of three months.
4. In view of that, writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
(R. N. LADDHA, J.)
Sameer
Mohamood Abdul Rafiq Mahhood Ibrahim
The State of Maharashtra
Chief Officer of the Municipal Council, Beed
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court