The petitioners writ petition was disposed of by the Court observing that a prior order in Writ Petition No. 14297 of 2018 set aside the impugned order, leaving nothing for adjudication.
None. The petition was disposed of as the impugned order was already set aside in a prior writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 122-wp 8240-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8240 OF 2021
Alkadevi Laxmanrao Adhav
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Respondents
Mrs. Suvarna Zaware, Advocate h/f Mr. Rahul B. Temak, Advocate for
the Petitioner.
Mr. S. P. Tiwari, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Mrs. Manjushri V. Narwade, Advocate for Respondent No. 3.
Mr. Vinayak S. Bedre, Advocate for Respondent No. 4.
Mr. S. S. Jadhavar, Advocate for Respondent No. 5.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATED : 11th October, 2021.
PER COURT:-
.We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the respondents.
2.As it is submitted by learned counsel for respondent No. 5 that
the order of the Deputy Director of Education sought to be
implemented by the petitioner is set aside by this Court under order
dated 14.09.2021 in Writ Petition No. 14297 of 2018, nothing survives
for adjudication in the present writ petition.
3. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
P.S.B.
1 of 1
Alkadevi Laxmanrao Adhav
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court