The petitioner sought leave to withdraw Public Interest Litigation No. 40 of 2021. The court granted the leave and disposed of the petition as withdrawn with no costs.
Leave to withdraw the PIL petition granted; order dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-PIL-40-2021
Pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISIDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 40 OF 2021
Chaitali Popatrao Pachpute .. Petitioner
Versus
Maharashtra Public Service Commission & Anr.
.. Respondents
Mr. Niranjan P. Bhavake i/by Mr. Kamlesh Y. Mali for petitioner.
Mr. Manish Jagtap i/by J. Shekhar & Co. for respondent No.1.
Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader with Smt. Nisha Mehra, AGP for respondent No.2-State.
C0RAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE : JULY 30, 2021
PC :
PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT
1
Digitally signed by PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2021.07.30 15:46:53 +0530
Chaitali Popatrao Pachpute
Maharashtra Public Service Commission
State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
