The High Court refused to entertain a separate Public Interest Litigation alleging vacancies in the Health Department, holding that the grievance was already the subject of another pending PIL.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
993 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.81 OF 2021
CHANDULAL MOHANLAL BIYANI VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. S.G. Munde GP for Respondents State : Mr. D.R. Kale ASG for Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr. R.R. Bangar
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & R.N. LADDHA, JJ. DATED : 05/08/2021.
PER COURT :
. Heard Mr. Mundhe, learned advocate. The learned Government Pleader submits that cognizance of filling up of the vacant posts in Health Department is a subject matter in P.I.L. No. 47/2021. The scope of P.I.L. is enlarged and the vacancies throughout the State is a subject matter.
[ R.N. LADDHA, J. ] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
ssc/
CHANDULAL MOHANLAL BIYANI
THE UNION OF INDIA
OTHERS
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
R.N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
