Allowed

Larsen and Toubro Ltd. v. the Union of India and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC29 Jul 2021WP/1497/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the petitioner-complainant sought direction to process 47 applications for scrip distribution under the Focus Product Scheme. The court directed the Additional Director General of Foreign Trade to decide applications within one month after an opportunity of hearing, permitting electronic compliance without certified copies.

What did the court decide?

Direction to process 47 applications for scrip within one month after hearing the petitioner.

Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs the Union of India and 2 Ors. — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

13-WP.1497.2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 1497 OF 2021

¶4

Larsen & Toubro Limited } Petitioner Versus The Union of India and Ors. } Respondents

¶5

Mr.Prakash Shah with Mr.Mihir Mehta, Mr.Jas Sanghavi and Mr.Durgo Prasad Poojari i/b. PDS Legal for the petitioner.

¶6

Mr.Pradeep Jetly-Senior Advocate with Mr.Jitendra B. Mishra for respondent nos. 1 to 3.

¶7

CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.

¶8

DATE :- JULY 29, 2021

¶9

PC :-

¶10

1. The grievance of the petitioner is that 47 applications filed by it for issuance of scrip under the Focus Product Scheme have not been processed by the respondents.

¶11

2. Having heard Mr.Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr.Jetly, learned senior advocate for the respondents, we are of the considered opinion that the Additional Director General of Foreign Trade (respondent no.3) may be directed to process the applications and take a final decision on such applications in accordance with law and upon granting an opportunity of hearing to the authorized officer of the petitioner, if not excluded by any express provision of law or by necessary implication, within one month from date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is ordered accordingly.

Page 1 of 2

J.V.Salunke,PS

13-WP.1497.2021

3. The writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶16

4. All contentions are left open.

¶17

5. We permit the petitioner to download a copy of this order and serve the same on the Additional Director General of Foreign Trade and such officer will proceed to comply with the order without insisting for production of a certified copy of the order.

¶18

6. Mr.Mishra, learned advocate for the respondents shall also download the order and forward the same to the Additional Director General of Foreign Trade for compliance.

¶19

SALUNKE J V

¶20

Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2021.07.30 11:18:06 +0530

¶21

(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶22

Page 2 of 2

¶23

J.V.Salunke,PS

Larsen and Toubro Ltd. v. the Union of India and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Larsen and Toubro Ltd. v. the Union of India and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishnu Babaji Gavali Vs State of Maharashtra through the Urban Development and Ors.

The Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) , Nhav Sheva Preventive Unit (Nspu) Vs Boxster Impex Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

The Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Nhava Sheva Preventive Unit (Nspu) Vs Dunox Trading and Exports Private Ltd. and Ors.

Shri. Tukaram Rajba Phavade Vs the Regional Dairy Development Officer, Pune Region and Anr.

Life Insurance Corporation of India and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Pratapsingh Ganpatsing Chopadar Vs the Chairman Msbshe Pune and Anr.