The High Court granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw a public interest litigation and disposed of the petition accordingly. There was no order as to costs.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition; the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15-PIL.44.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 44 OF 2021
Janardan Barku Yedge } Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra } and Ors. } Respondents
Ms.Sonal Brid i/b. YMK Legal for the petitioner.
Mr.P.P.Kakade-Government Pleader with Ms.R.A.Salunkhe-AGP for State.
CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE :- AUGUST 5, 2021
PC :-
1. Ms. Brid, learned advocate for the petitioner, on written instructions received from the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Leave granted. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
SALUNKE J V
Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2021.08.06 10:47:37 +0530
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PS
Janardan Barku Yedge
The State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
