Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a public interest litigation petition concerning allocated plots reserved for health purposes. The court granted the request for withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-PIL.33.2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 33 OF 2021
Vishnu Babaji Gavali}Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Ors.}Respondents
Mr.Vishal Kanade i/b. Mr.Rahul Soman and Mr.Shen D.
Gadgil for the petitioner.
Mr.P.P.Kakade-Government Pleader with Mr.B.V. Samant-
AGP for State.
Mr.Jagdish Reddy (Aradwad) for respondent no.3
(Panvel Municipal Corporation)
CORAM :-DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ &
G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE :-JULY 19, 2021
PC :-
1.After the hearing of this PIL petition progressed for some time,
Mr.Kanade, learned advocate for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw
this PIL petition praying for liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh
petition in respect of the plots which are reserved for health purposes
and which are yet to be allotted.
2.Allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Disposed of.
No costs.
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PS
Vishnu Babaji Gavali
State of Maharashtra
Other Respondents
Dipankar Datta
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court