The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the PIL as withdrawn with no costs awarded.
PIL withdrawn; disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 pil 38.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 38 OF 2021
Sayyed Yunus Sayyed Mannan .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri D. K. Dagadkhair, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 24TH MARCH, 2021.
FINAL ORDER :
. The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation. The Public Interest Litigation is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
bsb/March 21
Sayyed Yunus Sayyed Mannan
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
