In Writ Petitions 5162 and 5163 of 2021, petitioners sought approval for appointment as peons. Directions were issued to the respondent authority to decide pending proposals on merits within six months. Writ petitions were disposed of.
Directed respondent No. 2 to decide pending proposals on merits within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 5162.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5162 OF 2021
Bhupesh Ramchandra Patil .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Pralhad D. Bachate, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. B. Yawalkar, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 5163 OF 2021
Yogesh Pandharinath Bacchav .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Pralhad D. Bachate, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. B. Yawalkar, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 24TH MARCH, 2021.
FINAL ORDER :
. The learned counsel for petitioners submits that, the proposals seeking approval to the appointment of the petitioners as peons in both the matters are pending with the respondent No. 2.
2 wp 5162.21
for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
bsb/March 21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petitions seeking approval of appointment as peons are maintainable when proposals are pending.
Bhupesh Ramchandra Patil
Yogesh Pandharinath Bacchav
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
