Sole order discharging a PIL filed by the petitioner as purpose served. The petition was disposed of without costs.
PIL disposed; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25.17PIL.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
993 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 25 OF 2017
RAJARAM KONDIBA MUDHOLKAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
Mr.V.D.Patnoorkar, Advocate for the
petitioner.
Mr.A.R.Kale, AGP for the respondent-State.
Mr.N.S.Kadam, Advocate for respondent nos.4
and 5.
Mr.A.G.Talhar, ASG for respondent no.6.
CORAM: S.V.GANGAPURWALA&
SHRIKANT D.KULKARNI,JJ.
DATE : 16.03.2021.
P.C.
1]Mr.Patnoorkar, learned counsel for
the petitioner submits that purpose of the
Writ Petition stands served.
2]PIL as such disposed of. No costs.
[SHRIKANT D.KULKARNI,J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.]
DDC
RAJARAM KONDIBA MUDHOLKAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
SHRIKANT D.KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court