A writ petition challenging the non-decision on a petitioner's claim for scholarship fee reimbursement was disposed of, directing respondents to decide within six months if the matter was pending with a specific respondent.
Respondents directed to decide the fee reimbursement proposal within six months if pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
961-wp-5125-2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5125 OF 2021
Priti D/o Shatrughnna Gandle... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and others... Respondents.
Mr. A.D. Gadekar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P.N. Kutti, A.G.P. for all the Respondents.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 23rd MARCH, 2021
PER COURT:-
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of
the petitioner for scholarship / reimbursement of fees for the 1st year
and 2nd year of B.D.F.C. is not decided.
2. The learned A.G.P. accepts notice for all the respondents.
1 of 2
961-wp-5125-2021
2
3. In case, the proposal for reimbursement of fees / scholarship to the petitioner (page Nos.17 to 19) is pending with respondent No.4, then the respondents shall take decision upon it according to the policy, preferably within a period of six (06) months.
4. The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI )( S.V. GANGAPURWALA )
JUDGE JUDGE
S.P. Rane
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's claim for scholarship or reimbursement of fees for BD.F.C. years 1 and 2 required adjudication in the writ petition.
Priti D/o Shatrughnna Gandle
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court