Petitioner approached High Court due to Tahsildar not deciding an application for mutation entry correction. Advocate for respondents accepted notice and mentioned alternative remedies, leading to disposal of the writ petition.
N/A
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
908
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
908 WRIT PETITION NO.5029 OF 2021
MANDAKINI ANKUSHRAO THOTE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR AURANGABADAND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr R L Bhusare Patil AGP for Respondents State: Mr. P. N. Kutti
ORDER :
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
JPC
Page 1 of 1
MANDAKINI ANKUSHRAO THOTE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
THE COLLECTOR AURANGABAD
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
