Disposed
Chandrakant Panditrao Bangar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCWP/394/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp39416.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 394 OF 2016
Dr. Chandrakant s/o Panditrao Bangar
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr. S.S. Thombre, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, AGP, for Respondent No.1. Mr. K.C. Sant, advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. V.S. Kadam, advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, C.J. & S.S. SHINDE, J.
DATE : 27th August, 2021.
PC :
Mr. Thombre, learned counsel for the petitioner,
submits that by effuu of time, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of such submission, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No costs.
JUDGE
CHIEF JUSTICE
adb
Dr. Chandrakant
The State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court