Single-judge High Court of Bombay disposed of Writ Petition No. 2028 of 2015 by directing the State of Maharashtra to decide the petitioner's representation within eight weeks.
Direct respondent No.2 to decide petitioner’s application within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2 wp 2028.15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2028 of 2015
Sainath Hender Raut versus
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
…...Petitioner
…...Respondents
Mr. Suhas M. Oak i/b. Mr. Sagar A. Joshi, advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATE : 6th AUGUST, 2018.
P. C. :
Having heard Mr. Oak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Thakur, learned AGP for the State, we deem it convenient to dispose of this petition by directing respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner's application/representation dated 6th July, 2018, filed through his power of attorney, a copy of which is annexed at “Exhibit – J”, page 28 as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Ordered accordingly.
Shubhada Shankar Kadam
Shubhada S Kadam 1/2
Digitally signed by Shubhada Shankar Kadam Date: 2018.08.07 13:02:44 +0530
2 wp 2028.15.doc
[SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
Shubhada S Kadam 2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner’s representation should be decided expeditiously by the concerned authority.
Sainath Hender Raut
The State of Maharashtra
Shubhada Shankar Kadam
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhu Dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
