The Single Bench made a procedural order noting the name of the petitioner for correction in case records. No substantive legal issue was decided.
Direction to mention the name of respondent number 4 correctly in the judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
0103pil116.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.116/2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 23/2018 AND WRIT PETITION NO.1/2018.
Devendra Punjabrao Godbole.
State of Maharashtra and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 01, 2018.
Shri U.K. Bisen, learned Counsel for the
petitioner and Shri S.M. Ukey, learned Addl.G.P. for respondents.
mentioned in judgment in aforesaid matters. Necessary correction be carried out accordingly.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
1 issue framed by the court
Correction of respondent number in case records.
Devendra Punjabrao Godbole
State of Maharashtra
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI
MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
