The court observed that directions sought in this PIL were unnecessary based on a prior Division Bench judgment (CWP No. 791 of 2016). Consequently, the Public Interest Litigation was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
91.17PIL
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 91 OF 2017
RAMDAS DAYARAM PATIL VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for petitioner:Mr.S.D. Munde
AGP for Respondent/State:Mr.C.S. Kulkarni
Advocate for respondent nos.3 to 7 : Mr.N.B.
Suryawanshi
Advocate for respondent nos. 8 and 9 :Mr.K.D.
Bade Patil
...
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. Dated: January 22, 2018
Heard learned counsel appearing for
the parties.
2.Learnedcounselappearingfor
Respondent Nos.8 and 9 has tendered
across the Bar, copy of the judgment
passed by the Division Bench (Coram :
S.S. Shinde and K.K. Sonawane, JJ) in
Criminal Writ Petition No. 791 of 2016
( Shri S.P. Bodkhe and others V/s the
91.17PIL
2
State of Maharashtra and another) decided
on 4th May, 2017. The same is taken on
record.
3.In view of the observations made in
paragraph no.34 of the said judgment, in
our opinion, the directions as sought in
this P.I.L. to the Respondents are not
necessary. In that view of the matter,
the P.I.L. stands disposed of.
SGA/
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shri S.P. Bodkhe and others V/s the State of Maharashtra and anotherReferred¶15
Criminal Writ Petition No. 791 of 2016 (Shri S.P. Bodkhe and others V/s the State of Maharashtra and another)
Ramdas Dayaram Patil
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court