The Civil Court application was allowed resulting in the deletion of Respondent No. 4. The writ petition was listed for final hearing along with connected petitions.
Civil Application allowed; deletion of respondent No. 4; writ petition listed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
230118caw112.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
CAW NO. 112/2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6175 OF 2016
(Anand s/o Narayanrao Jammu vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Principal Secretary & Ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,_____________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ. JANUARY 23, 2018.
Shri F.T. Mirza with Shri A.K. Waghmare, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. N.P. Mehta, learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 & 2, Shri J.B. Kasat, learned counsel for respondent No. 3, Ms. Neerja Chaubey, learned counsel for the applicant/ respondent No. 4 and Mrs. A. Joshi, learned counsel for respondent No. 5.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*GS.
ANAND S/O NARAYANRAO JAMMU
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
RESPONDENT NO. 3
APPLICANT/ RESPONDENT NO. 4
RESPONDENT NO. 5
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
