The Bench disposed of a PIL directing Respondent No.2 to decide a representation filed by the petitioner, afford an opportunity of hearing, decide expeditiously within eight weeks, and list for compliance.
Direction to Respondent No.2 to decide representation, afford hearing, and decide within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
107.17PIL
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 107 OF 2017
KONDAPPA SADASHIV KORE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the
petitioner:Mr.Uttareshwar M. Maske Patil
holding for Mr. R.V. Naiknavare
GP for respondent/State:Mr.A.B. Girase
a/w A.G.P. Mr.S.Y. Mahajan
...
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & S.M. GAVHANE, JJ. Dated: January 25, 2018
The Public Interest Litigation is
disposed of with directions to Respondent
No.2 to decide the representation of the
petitioner filed on 10th March, 2017,
keeping in view the pleadings in the
Petition, annexures thereto and also
other record necessary for deciding the
said representation. We direct Respondent
No.2 to afford opportunity of hearing to
107.17PIL
2
the petitioner. Respondent No.2 shall
give opportunity to the petitioner to put
forth his contentions and to place on
record the documents, if any. We also
direct Respondent No.2 to take such
decision on the said representation, as
expeditiously as possible, and preferably
within eight weeks from today.
2.With the above observations, the
PublicInterestLitigationstands
disposed of.
3.List for compliance of today's
order/directions in Caption "Compliance"
on 26th March, 2018.
(S.M. GAVHANE, J) (S.S. SHINDE,J)
SGA/
Kondappa Sadashiv Kore
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
S.M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court