The High Court of Judicature at Bombay transferred Public Interest Litigation No.82 of 2007 to the National Green Tribunal relying on a judgment of the Apex Court in Bhopal Gas.
The petition is transferred to the National Green Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil-82.07.odt
pmw
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.82 OF 2007
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. Anoop Pandey for the Petitioner. Mr. Manish M. Pabale, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3, 6 and 7.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 25th JANUARY, 2018
P.C.
petitioner on the basis of judgment of the Apex Court
in the case of Bhopal Gas Vs. Union of India and Ors .1 seeks transfer of this Petition to the National Green Tribunal. Accordingly, the Petition is transferred to National Green Tribunal. Registrar (Judicial – I ) will take consequential action.
(P.N. DESHMUKH, J) (A.S. OKA, J)
1 2012 (8) SCC 326
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner’s PIL should be transferred to the National Green Tribunal in light of the Supreme Court’s judgment in Bhopal Gas.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bhopal Gas Vs. Union of India and OrsReferred¶1
Bhopal Gas Vs. Union of India and Ors
Petitioner
Respondent Nos.1 to 3, 6 and 7
A.S. OKA
P.N. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
