Civil Application seeking condonation of 255 days delay was allowed. The non-applicants did not oppose the application.
Civil Application allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) CA No.12695/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12695 OF 2013 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4300 OF 2010
Shamkant Kashinath Patil & anr.
Applicants.
Versus
North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon and others. Respondents.
Mr. S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for the applicants.
Mr. L.S. Mahajan, Advocate for respondent No.3.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL,JJ.
Dated : 10th August, 2018.
PER COURT :-
. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants. Learned
Counsel for the non applicants opposes the application for condonation of delay on the ground that sufficient cause is not stated.
(2) CA No.12695/2013
and the affidavit supporting the Application, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'.
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE
vdd/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is stated for condoning a delay of 255 days for filing the application.
Shamkant Kashinath Patil
North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sunil K. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
