Preliminary order in Writ Petition No. 1663 of 2014 disposing of the petition for unspecified reasons without awarding costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
43-wp-1663-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
43 WRIT PETITION NO. 1663 OF 2014
APPASAHEB SAMBHAJIRAO KHANDAGALE..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Narayan R. Salunke, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
Mr. A. V. Deshmukh, AGP for Respondent-State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATED : 09th AUGUST, 2018.
PER COURT:-
.For the reasons to be recorded separately,
writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
JUDGE JUDGE
Devendra/August-18
Appasaheb Sambhajirao Khandagale
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Sunil K. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court